![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/commodityconversations.com\/wordpress2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/monsanto-152587_1280.png?resize=525%2C661&ssl=1\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Last week, Monsanto<\/a>\u2014the agribusiness company that everyone loves to hate\u2014was ordered to pay $US289 million to Mr. Dewayne Johnson, a former school groundskeeper, after a San Francisco jury ruled that the company\u2019s popular Roundup weed killer contributed to the cancer that is killing him.<\/p>\n Glyphosate, the main ingredient in Roundup, was first approved for use in Monsanto\u2019s weed killer in 1974, and has since been the subject of much emotive debate both in and out of the scientific community.<\/p>\n In September 2017, the\u00a0 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency concluded a decades-long assessment of glyphosate risks and found that the chemical was not likely to be carcinogenic to humans. However, back in 2015, the International Agency for Research on Cancer, which is part of the World Health Organisation, classified it as a \u201cprobable human carcinogen\u201d. Since then, California has added glyphosate to its list of chemicals known to cause cancer.<\/p>\n Mr Johnson’s lawsuit was the first to go to trial among hundreds filed in state and federal US courts that claim that Roundup causes non-Hodgkin\u2019s lymphoma. Monsanto has said it will appeal the verdict.<\/p>\n However, the trial was an important test of the evidence against Monsanto, and will serve as a template for litigating thousands of other claims over the herbicide. Shares in Bayer AG<\/a> (Monsanto\u2019s parent company) fell sharply as investors weighed the potential costs of protracted legal battles. Bayer bought Monsanto for $66 billion in June this year.<\/p>\n Among the varied lawsuits against Monsanto is one from a bee keepers\u2019 cooperative in France that claims that glyphosate is now widely found in honey.\u00a0The US\u2019s Food and Drug Administration also recently found traces<\/a> of glyphosate in US honey, even apparently in \u201corganic mountain honey\u201d. The U.S. Organic Consumers Association and Beyond Pesticides filed a lawsuit against Sue Bee Honey of Sioux City, Iowa, because its honey tested positive for traces of glyphosate. The lawsuit said Sue Bee\u2019s labelling, advertising its honey as \u201cPure\u201d and \u201cNatural,\u201d is false and misleading. Another class action was started last year in Canada against a honey producer<\/a><\/p>\n Meanwhile, a federal judge in Brazil<\/a> has ordered the suspension of products containing glyphosate until the government re-evaluates the chemical’s toxicology. France has already<\/a>\u00a0ruled that the herbicide will be phased out completely within five years.<\/p>\n Unsurprisingly, Monsanto has been accused of a corporate cover-up,<\/a> with many on social media arguing that the company knew all along that their product causes cancer. Some scientists accused the company of \u201cghost writing\u201d the scientific studies into the herbicide, and of trying \u201cto destroy the United Nations\u2019 cancer agency by any means possible\u201d to save glyphosate.<\/p>\n Some on social media were quick to draw attention to an arguably similar ruling<\/a> back in March where a Californian judge ruled that coffee companies will have to carry a cancer warning label because coffee contains acrylamide, a carcinogen. The acrylamide in coffee is formed early in the roasting process. All the foods we roast or fry also contain acrylamide<\/a>, with 5 micrograms in a slice of toast or 7 micrograms in a bag of potato crisps, as examples. A cup of coffee has around 0.9 micrograms to 2.4 micrograms per 150 millilitre cup.<\/p>\n Others drew similarities between the Monsanto ruling and the recent EU\u2019s almost complete ban<\/a> on the use of neonicotinoid insecticides across the EU. Just as glyphosate is the world\u2019s widest used herbicide, neonicotinoids are the most widely used insecticides. Back in 2013 the European Union opted for a partial ban on the use of the three chemicals in this class: Imidacloprid, clothianidin and thiamethoxam. The restrictions applied to crops including maize, wheat, barley, oats and oil seed rape. The newly agreed Commission regulation goes much further, meaning that almost all outdoor uses of the chemicals would be banned.<\/p>\n The action was driven by a recent report from the European Food Safety Authority (Efsa), which found that neonicotinoids posed a threat to many species of bees, no matter where or how they are used in the outdoor environment.<\/p>\n The decision is likely to particularly affect sugar beet production<\/a> across the EU. The French sugar beet growers group CGB said, \u201cThis decision has a devastating impact on beet growing. With this ban, all French regions are likely to be affected by viral jaundice, with potential yield losses estimated at 12 pct at national level, and up to 50 pct in certain ocean climate zones.\u201d Producers in the UK and Germany expressed similar opinions while others questioned whether neonicotinoids actually cause bee colony collapse disorder<\/a><\/p>\n These two latest rulings follow on from one by the European Court of Justice (on 25th July) that organisms obtained by mutagenesis plant breeding technique (gene-editing)<\/a> are GMOs and should fall under the GMO Directive. The decision shocked the agriculture industry<\/a>, which described it as a severe blow to innovation in EU agriculture and warned about economic and environmental consequences.<\/p>\n In a piece for Foreign Affairs published in April, Bill Gates<\/a> outlined the case for using CRISPR and other gene-editing techniques on a global scale to meet growing demand for food and to improve disease prevention, particularly for malaria. \u201cIt would be a tragedy to pass up the opportunity,\u201d he wrote.<\/p>\n In agriculture, Gates argues,<\/a> gene-editing technologies could be used to make animals more productive while editing crops to withstand harsher growing conditions, or to include naturally occurring pesticides and herbicides, would improve crop yields.<\/p>\n These three rulings will make life more challenging for some farmers and may have major secondary implications. I will take up some of the issues in next week\u2019s blog.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/commodityconversations.com\/wordpress2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/bulgaria-1351947_1920.jpg?resize=525%2C350&ssl=1\")
<\/p>\n