AgriCensus Report

Bunge to work with Wilmar in Vietnam’s ‘tough’ market

Agribusiness majors Bunge and Wilmar are expected to cooperate in Vietnam’s meal market, as the country’s tough market conditions continue to pose challenges for agriculture suppliers, market sources told Agricensus Tuesday.

The shake up comes as Japan’s Marubeni transferred all its operations to Enerfo from November 1 amid difficult trading conditions as the country grapples with an outbreak of African swine fever and slim margins.

The note, seen by Agricensus, states Wilmar Marketing CLV would be the agent for Vietnam Agribusiness Limited, Vietnam Agribusiness Holdings PTE Ltd and Bunge Asia PTE Ltd with effect from November 1.

All three companies are part of Bunge, the B in the ABCD quartet of global agribusiness giants, with market sources saying the statement follows rumours that the two companies had been exploring ways to work together in the country.

According to the note, Wilmar will assume responsibility for sales of soymeal, corn, feed wheat and other agri products.

Vietnam’s feed supply sector has been hit hard by shifting dynamics in its pig sector, with the industry undergoing huge expansion as it catered for China’s pork demand and burgeoning domestic demand.

However, a slowdown in demand from China in 2017 hit the sector hard, before China’s outbreak of ASF spread across the country’s border in early 2019 and infected most of Vietnam within months, with the loss of 5.7 million pigs

The feed sector continues to see major corn imports arriving, with November likely to see up to 1.4 million mt arrive again, as poultry and aquaculture pick up some of the slack.

But the rampant price of pigs domestically is likely to bring further incentive amongst farmers to repopulate their pig herds.

“The market is tough, life is very difficult. People are coming in and out of the market, but people are only losing money in Vietnam trades,” one market source said.

Both Singapore-based Wilmar and US-based Bunge were contacted for comment but Agricensus had received no reply by the time of publication.

AgriCensus Prices

Over 140 daily wheat, corn, soy, barley vegoils, meals and freight price assessments

Subscribe now

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Right Time, Right Place

A conversation with Khoon Hong Kuok

Wilmar International Limited was founded in 1991 as Wilmar Trading Pte Ltd in Singapore with an initial capital of $100,000. It is now Asia’s leading agribusiness group with a market capitalisation of US$16 billion and a turnover in 2018 of nearly $45 billion. That’s not bad for a relative newcomer in what is traditionally considered to be a slow growth industry.

I caught up with Khoon Hong Kuok, the co-founder and CEO of Wilmar, in Beijing, where he told me that this was the first interview he had ever given. I asked him the secret of Wilmar’s success.

“Right time, right place and plenty of luck,” he replied. “In 1991 when I started Wilmar, Malaysia and Indonesia produced 9.0 million tonnes of palm oil compared to 62.5 million tonnes in 2018. In 1991, China imported 136,000 tonnes of soybeans compared to 84 million tonnes in 2018. These developments enabled us to become a major palm oil trader and a major agriculture commodity processor.”

“NGO’s have criticised Wilmar over sustainability and the environment. How would you respond?” I asked.

“In the old days palm oil plantations were burning forests to clear land and some even discharged effluents in the rivers. Today most major plantation group adopt sustainable practices. The NGOs have been a force for good in this.

“We are the biggest player in palm oil. So even though we stopped planting oil palm in new areas many years ago—and we were among the earliest to adopt sustainable practices—the NGOs still criticised us for buying palm oil from other producers who were burning to develop new areas. The NGOs attack the big names like us, not the smaller producers who sell to us.

“Having seen the deterioration in the environment due to burning and other irresponsible practices of some plantations, we decided to take a lead even if we had to sacrifice some business. The accusation that palm oil is not environmentally friendly is no longer fair.”

“What about labour issues?” I asked.

“Palm plantations bring good jobs deep into inland areas far from the towns. You need engineers, agronomists, and accountants—a lot of people. We need about 0.2 people for every hectare of palm. So if you have 10,000 hectares you need about 2,000 and if you include their families, it supports a lot of people. To attract and retain staff, you have to build good housing for your employees, as well as schools and clinics. In those rural areas the government does not usually provide good facilities.”

“I have been told that you could increase palm oil production without increasing the area…that with better trees you could double production. Is that true?” I asked.

“With better seedlings, technology and management, the yield of new palm plantations today are much higher than the past. This is especially so in Africa where production can be increased significantly by re-planting the old plantations thus minimizing deforestation.”

“You have concentrated your energies in Asia and Africa. Why don’t you invest in the West?”

“We have a strong position in Asian and African countries with over 4.5 billion people. The population and economic growth of these countries are among the highest in the world, and per capita consumption of agri-commodities is increasing. The population of North, Central, South America and Western Europe combined is less than 1.5 billion and per capital consumption is not increasing much.

“We do not have the financial resources, brands and distribution network of the food giants in the West. We don’t want to go to markets where we have no comparative advantage.”

“How do you see the Chinese market developing?” I asked.

“The Chinese are the fussiest people in the world when it comes to food. China will soon become not only the biggest but also the most sophisticated food market in the world.

“To succeed in a very competitive country like China you have to produce, market and distribute the best quality product at the lowest cost. Our integrated plants mean that our production costs are lower than our competitors, and our bigger volumes and multiple locations give us lower marketing and distribution costs.”

“You are known for working 16 hours a day. How do you manage to grow into such a big business but still maintain control over it?”

“I work 16 hours on some days but not every day. If I were to drop dead tomorrow our existing business would continue successfully. People think I spend a lot of time running our existing businesses. I don’t. The time I do spend is to ensure we have sound risk management, to ensure we have good people managing it and to make sure our operations work closely with each other to bring out the full synergies of our group.”

“Have you tried to persuade your children to come into the business?”

“I believe that you must let your children pursue their interests. Our job is pretty tough; you have to have a passion for it. The decision in my case is simpler because I don’t have a controlling interest in Wilmar. My children do not have the birthright to take over from me. They can only do so if they are good enough.”

“Thank you Khoon Hong for your time and insights!”

© Commodity Conversations ®

This is an extract of a conversation that is published in my new book Out of the Shadows – The New Merchants of Grain available soon on Amazon

Commodity Conversations Weekly Press Summary

The global demand for livestock and feed is expected to recover in 2020 when China will have gone through 5-months production worth of meat in cold storage – a direct result of the African Swine Fever (AFS) culling. The analysis by S&P Global Ratings argued that this will help the bottom line of trade houses which have been hurt by the AFS as well as the US-China trade war, especially companies with strong exposure to US origination. In the absence of any major consolidation, agricultural trading groups are expected to continue to look at divesting unprofitable assets, as is already the case for Bunge and ADM for their sugar and ethanol business units. 

BP and Bunge are still waiting for antitrust approvals from three countries, including China, for their joint venture which they hope to finalise this year. Bunge reported a loss of USD 1.5 billion for the third quarter, compared to a profit of USD 365 million the previous year. This includes a USD 1.7 billion charge following the merger of its Brazilian sugarcane business with BP. Good results in South America and in its edible oil segment were insufficient to offset the damages caused by the ongoing US-China trade conflict. In the hope of a resolution in the conflict and higher prices, US farmers have been withholding crops, especially soybeans. The CEO forecast that annual earnings would drop as much as 20% compared to last year. 

Another country where farmers are holding on to their crop is Argentina where producers are eagerly waiting for the newly elected President to explain his policies on agriculture, especially exports. There is a concern that he will increase taxes on grain exports and even bring back export quota limits. Farmers told Reuters that a return to these populist measures would hurt revenues, adding that the last time quotas were implemented wheat and corn planting collapsed. Some say the country could implement a dual exchange rate to help agriculture exports compete thanks to a weaker currency. 

In neighbouring Brazil, Cargill is pushing for the soybean industry to capture more of the value chain and focus on exporting processed products such as meal and soy oil. The call was echoed by the country’s vegetable oil association which pointed out that, ironically, the share of soybean exports stood at 81% of soybean products exported in 2017, compared to 13% back in 1981, when 87% of exports was in the form of meal. In Europe, meanwhile, Cargill announced it was putting USD 35 million in a product line to produce soluble fibres which can reduce sugar content in confectionery products by 30% without affecting the taste or texture. 

Olam Cocoa launched its Cocoa Compass initiative this week which sets targets aligned with UN Sustainable Development Goals. Among the commitments, Olam is aiming to eradicate child labour and deforestation by 2030. It will also work towards improving farmers’ incomes and has agreed to pay the Living Income Differential (LID) premium of USD 400/mt on 100,000mt of cocoa it bought from Ghana and the Ivory Coast. In the US, meanwhile, several industry groups, including Coca-Cola, are warning that the Ninth Circuit Court’s decision to hold Nestle liable for slavery in cocoa plantations in Ivory Coast could actually discourage companies from trying to tackle the issue.

A Greenpeace plastic waste collecting initiative in two areas in Thailand found that most of the waste came from single-use plastic from food packaging and that close to 20% of it was produced by five multinationals: Coca-Cola, Nestle, Ajinomoto, Mondelez, and Unilever. Italy is trying to deal with the issue by proposing to tax plastic in its 2020 budget at a rate of around USD 1/kg. A source told Reuters that the tax, if approved, would bring in over USD 1 billion and would help offset a cut in income tax. Unsurprisingly, beverage companies are opposing the proposal saying it would hurt their bottling operations, especially considering that the budget also includes a sugar tax. 

On the subject of bottling, The Guardian reported this week that conservation groups continue their fight to stop Nestle from accessing water in California’s Strawberry Creek. They accuse the group of depleting water levels and hardly paying for it while selling the bottled water at a profit. At the heart of the fight is a debate about who should control freshwater supply on public land, with Nestle’s former CEO arguing that it needs to be privatised. 

An analyst at Forrester Research forecast that the global food delivery market will likely go through major consolidation in 2020. Although the largest firms managed to raise significant funds in 2019, none reported a profit. Uber, DoorDash and Amazon are seen as the most likely to make acquisitions in the market. 

As China is busy eating through its stocks of meat, Russia quietly became Europe’s biggest importer of cows. This is the direct result of Russia’s policy to modernise its dairy sector, incentivised by the ban on imports of foreign dairy products. As of 2018, the country was 20% shy of being self-sufficient, mainly because a third of milk consumption is still supplied by low-yielding household cows. By 2027, however, Russia hopes to export to China and other Asian countries.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

AgriCensus Report

Argentina farmers face agriculture policy overhaul after Peronist victory

Sunday’s election that swept the Peronist parties back into government in Argentina after a four-year hiatus has prompted traders and farmers to brace for a return of export taxes as the country scrambles for foreign currency reserves.

In a result that was widely expected, Alberto Fernandez of Frente de Todos (Front for All) trounced the incumbent centre-right president, Mauricio Macri, in the polls, winning 48% of the vote versus 40.5% with the remaining 6.2% picked up by independent candidate Roberto Lavagne.

By attracting more than 45% of the vote, the result means Fernandez will avoid a run-off between the top two candidates and will take office in the Casa Rosada on December 10.

However, his support was lower than the 15-percentage point lead the opinion polls pointed to.

And while he attracted support in Buenos Aires province, which is the largest province in terms of agriculture production, Fernandez got fewer votes than Macri in other key agriculture provinces such as Cordoba, Santa Fe and Entre Rios.

To prop up the battered peso, which has lost 50% of its value this year, the Argentina Central Bank on Monday limited the purchase of dollars by citizens to $200 per month.

While this does not impact foreign trade, the trading community is already fearing a potential return to the restrictive export and interventionist policies in the agriculture market that were widely adopted by Peronists from 2008 through to 2015.

While a return to higher export taxes is seen as a given, a bigger fear is the imposition of export quotas or even limits on land ownership to appease a voter base that advocated redistribution of wealth.

Indeed, earlier this year lawmaker Felipe Sola of Frente de Todos had called for interventionist measures in the domestic wheat market to regulate the domestic price of bread.

And Juan Grabois, a social leader with very close ties with the Frente de Todos coalition recently suggested that the next government should limit land ownership to 5,000 hectares.

With inflation running at 55% this year, and given the need to attract foreign reserves, few analysts expect quotas and land restrictions this early in the government.

Meanwhile, the prospect of a dual exchange rate will almost certainly become increasingly apparent, with one for financial markets and a lower rate for trade to ensure farmers are competitive.

Tax hike

“The new government is prone to increasing tax exports. Nobody in the world will give them even a coin as a loan, so they’ll have to look for a way to get money to finance the public expenditure. I think they´ll rise tax exports on cereals and oilseeds,” said one market source.

Current taxes on cereals stand at 4 pesos per goods exported – around 7%.

But in addition, exports of soybeans, soyoil and soymeal, attract an 18% flat rate taking the total to 25%.

Some market participants now expect those rates to rise to 20% for cereals and 30% for oilseeds and their derivatives – close to the 23% and 20% that was in place at the end of the last Peronist government.

Although others are less pessimistic, expecting a less onerous increase on grains at around 10%.

If taxes reach the higher end of those estimates, analysts at the Buenos Aires Grain Exchange anticipate that grain production will fall by 5.6% with exports slumping 14.4%.

That compares with overall grain production in the 2019/20 estimated at 131.7 million mt, down 3% compared with the previous year’s volume.

AgriCensus Prices

Over 140 daily wheat, corn, soy, barley vegoils, meals and freight price assessments

Subscribe now

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Commodity Conversations Weekly Press Summary

Nestle reported a 3.7% growth in organic sales over the first three quarters of the financial year.  Strong global Purina PetCare sales and demand for Starbucks products in North America helped offset disappointing sales for beverages, especially in the water segment. As a result, the CEO said Nestle Waters was being restructured so that it could be managed locally, instead of globally as is currently the case. The restructure should help identify consumer trends and higher-margin products amid an increasingly competitive market. 

The focus on increasing the group’s “local responsiveness” will take place across all segments thanks to a new strategy and business unit, the CEO said, adding that “In a period of rapid change in our industry, it will be more important than ever to recognize key trends early and to act on them fast.” Nestle will be looking actively to acquire more businesses aligned with this new strategy, the group said. It may also spend USD 20 billion in 2020-22 in share buybacks, thanks in part to the USD 10 billion generated from the sale of its skincare business earlier this month. Looking forward, a company official forecast that the world population will have to reduce its consumption of sugar, salt and meat to switch to vegetables and cereals as a result of the limited resources combined with the obesity epidemic. 

Danone lowered its 2019 growth forecast slightly after disappointing quarterly results in part due to cool summer temperatures in Europe which led to lower sales in its Waters Europe segment. Overall, however, sales grew 3.7% in the quarter, up from 3% last year, thanks to a strong growth in the specialised and early-life nutrition units which grew by 10%, mostly driven by the demand from China. 

The group’s investment arm, Danone Manifesto Ventures, bought a minority shareholding in organic plant-based food company Forager Project. This is part of its goal to increase revenue from plant-based products to USD 5.7 billion by 2025, from USD 1.9 billion currently. In Asia, meanwhile, the company launched a ‘One Person, One Voice, One Share’ initiative which aims to get employees involved in the Danone 2030 roadmap – designed to be in line with the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals.

Cargill launched a new platform, Feeding Intelligence, to help keep ranchers on top of the information, news and technology that impact their business. The group is streamlining its animal feed business in the US, resulting in the closure of two plants in New York in North Carolina. On the other hand, it will invest USD 225 million to expand and upgrade its soybean crushing assets in Ohio. 

In India, Cargill successfully removed 225mt of annual plastic packaging by replacing paper labels with mould-labeling on its edible oil bottles and reformulating the plastic it uses so that 90% of it is recyclable. On the sweetener side, Cargill announced that it was able to make the first liquid ingredient stevia. Stevia previously could not be used to make a concentrate, which limited its ability to function in beverages and energy drinks. 

Olam is in the process of acquiring the California-based almond company Hughson Nut Inc (HNI) as part of its aim to have a vertically integrated almond supply chain and add to its existing businesses in Australia and Vietnam. In Nigeria, meanwhile, shareholders gave the green light to Olam’s offer to buy the remaining shares in Dangote Flour Mills for USD 331 million. Olam also announced it has been granted a USD 1.5 billion revolving credit facility in addition to the USD 525 million sustainability loan it secured earlier this month. 

In Brazil, the agriculture minister said that COFCO was planning on investing in four sugar mills in the country. She urged the group to also invest in railway and ports to ease export logistics. 

In an unusual twist, Cote d’Ivoire and Ghana are threatening to scrap existing sustainability certification programs for cocoa if buyers don’t contract next year’s crop at a premium of USD 400/mt over October 2020 futures. Sources quoted by Bloomberg say that while most buyers have, in theory, accepted the premium many have yet to contract the crop as they don’t know how to hedge that premium. The West African countries call the premium a “living income differential” (LID) to offset the collapse in world prices and argue that it is more effective in helping farmers than sustainability certification premiums. However, some have pointed out that the LID, too, has failed to be passed on to farmers. Regardless, Nigeria and Cameroon are looking to follow suit while Peru could impose a minimum price. 

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

AgriCensus Report

SNAP ANALYSIS: Does China need another 10m mt of US soybeans?

On Tuesday, news emerged that Chinese authorities were poised to exempt 10 million mt of US soybeans from additional import tariffs arising from the trade war with the US, taking the total that can be imported without the 30% levy to 30 million mt.

The announcement comes ahead of a next round of trade talks expected to make headway in Santiago, Chile next month.

It is part of a long running saga that has seen the US hold off on escalating the trade war by raising tariffs on Chinese goods, providing China continues to purchase US agricultural goods.

However, it’s likely for two reasons that this quota may not be fully used.

Firstly, Chinese demand for beans is expected to fall by 10-15% this year compared to 2017 due to the ongoing outbreak of African swine fever.

China’s ministry of agriculture estimates that soybean imports will fall in the 2019/20 marketing year to 84 million mt from 94 million mt two years earlier, although private estimates are as low as 81 million mt.

And trade sources estimate that following yesterday’s buying spree of November cargoes from Brazil, just 7 million mt of Chinese demand is still open before yet another mammoth Brazilian harvest hits in February.

Secondly, Brazil soybeans are simply much cheaper from February onwards.

According to Agricensus data, from February onwards delivered Brazilian soybeans into North China are 40-60 c/bu cheaper than the US oilseed on a like-for-like basis.

That means in the absence of Chinese government stockpiling, the quota of 10 million mt is unlikely to be used.

“It is interesting… As the Chinese government releases quota, some parts of it have to be fulfilled, but there might not be profits in those purchases. US margins cannot compete with Brazil’s,” said one soybean trader at an international crusher.

With offers in the US Gulf for January shipment at 50 c/bu over futures, for US farmers to be competitive, they would have to offer soybeans at ports at parity to futures contract – a dynamic that rarely happens.

“US beans [crush] margins are pretty bad,” a second trader said, responding to the news that some Chinese crushers could be seeking December shipment out of the US Gulf on Tuesday.

It boils down to this, given China has said any purchases will be in line with market competitiveness, this will not be a blank cheque for US farmers.

And US soybean exports to China will still hit a six-year low in 2019, and largely because of a decline in demand rather than any trade war impact.

AgriCensus Prices

Over 140 daily wheat, corn, soy, barley vegoils, meals and freight price assessments

Subscribe now

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Commodity Conversations Weekly Press Summary

Commodity prices initially bounced when the US announced that it had reached a partial trade deal with China, although they eventually dropped back down once it emerged that it might take five-weeks for an agreement to be drafted. China reportedly agreed to double its import of US agricultural products and review some of its currency and intellectual property laws. However, an analyst called the trade targets “meaningless” until a proper breakthrough is announced, while a Chinese trader mentioned that trade negotiations were always one Tweet away from breaking down. 

China has already started to increase the amount of US goods it imports, according to trade officials. Nevertheless, the country might be looking to buy more US products simply because the supply in other countries such as Brazil is starting to tighten, making US origins cheaper. Moreover, China has been very active in investing to improve Brazil’s export infrastructure so it is unlikely to completely switch to other import origins. 

In the EU, the trade chief announced that the bloc will subsidise olive growers to help them deal with US tariffs. Under the plan, companies will receive money to buy and store excess olive oil. EU officials mentioned that the focus remained on finding a solution with the US to remove duties and address concerns around Airbus. 

Indonesia and Malaysia plan to challenge the EU’s decision to phase out the use of palm oil as a renewable fuel at the WTO, while they warn that they will also limit European imports in retaliation. In response, a member of the EU Parliament said he was confident the WTO would agree with the EU’s environmental concerns. He also clarified that palm oil will still be allowed as a fuel feedstock although it will not be recognised in the Renewable Energy Directive II (RED II).

A French court announced a similar ruling as it maintained a law that would exclude palm oil from tax advantages in 2020 despite an appeal by Total. The group recently spent EUR 300 million to convert its La Mede refinery to process palm oil and warned that it will not be competitive if it has to use local rapeseed instead. 

Palm oil producers who are certified as sustainable complain that large food companies refuse to pay a premium and that they mostly buy certified palm oil for European markets. Nestle revealed that 56% of the palm oil in EU goods was sustainable, compared to just 4% in India and 0% in China. In response, the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) announced that members, including Nestle and Unilever, will now face fines unless they increase the proportion of sustainable purchases by 15% every year. 

Meanwhile, India reportedly threatened to tax Malaysian palm oil in response to a comment by the Malaysian Prime Minister who criticised India’s Kashmir policies. A Malaysian minister said the country might import more raw sugar from India in order to ease trade relations.

The Mercosur bloc is planning to hold trade talks with Vietnam, Indonesia, South Korea and Singapore, according to Brazil’s trade minister. Mercosur also includes Uruguay, Paraguay and Argentina. Separately, Brazil’s space agency revealed that deforestation rates slowed in September but were still 96% above the same month last year. In the first nine months of the year, forest destruction was 93% higher, although the start of the rainy season should slow down burn rates. 

Environmentalists criticised large food companies in the UK for still using soya beans sourced from deforested regions in Brazil. Although 23 brands, including many fast-food chains, signed the Cerrado Manifesto in 2017, the pledge was not signed by Cargill who is responsible for a large portion of the UK’s soya imports. The firm argued that boycotting an area simply moved the problem somewhere else or left more room for other buyers. And a Brazilian official noted that boycotts could prevent sustainable economic development and make the problem worse. 

The CEO of Mondelez commented that food makers need to distinguish between consumer trends and actual purchasing behaviours. He argued that taste and not health will continue to be the main driver of purchases because of the “difference between what people say and what they do”. McDonald’s and Campbell Soup made similar remarks as their attempts to sell healthier products failed. KFC is another example and reportedly spent USD 8 million to make oven-grilled products, although consumers kept buying deep-fried food. 

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

AgriCensus Report

China confirms trade agreement with US, more agricultural purchases to come

The Chinese government officially confirmed that a tentative trade deal has been reached between China and the US with additional Chinese purchases of US agricultural products likely occuring later this year.

China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated on Tuesday that the US’ announcement of a partial trade deal between the world’s two largest economies are true.

“What the US said was the real situation, and was consistent with the situation we know,” said Geng Shuang, the spokesperson for the ministry during a press conference.

“The two sides are also unanimous in the issue of reaching an economic and trade agreement. There is no difference,” Geng added.

This was the first time that China has officially responded since US President Donald Trump announced a “substantial phase one deal” shortly following the conclusion of trade talks last Friday.

Meanwhile, the ministry confirmed that Chinese companies have imported large volume of US agricultural products since the beginning of this year and will purchase more, although declined to give details.

The ministry said Chinese companies had already purchased 20 million mt of soybeans, 700,000 mt of pork, 700,000 mt of sorghum, 230,000 mt of wheat as well as 320,000 mt of cotton.

The amount of soybeans bought by China in 2019 so far is similar to the country’s total import of 22.15 million mt from the US in 2018, but remains sharply lower than the 32.85 million mt it imported in 2017.

That contrasts with US pork imports, which at 700,000 mt this year is five times higher than before the trade war started in 2018.

China’s total import of pork in the first nine months of 2019 reached 1.33 million mt, up nearly 44% year-on-year.

The total imports in 2018 was only 1.19 million mt.

Regarding wheat imports, China only bought 361,292 mt from US in 2018.

AgriCensus Prices

Over 140 daily wheat, corn, soy, barley vegoils, meals and freight price assessments

Subscribe now

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Slaves or Masters

Most people believe that early agriculture enabled humans to build settlements, and that subsequent agricultural improvements have made humankind better off.

In his thought provoking book, Against the Grain – How agriculture has hijacked civilisation, Richard Manning disagrees on both issues. In particular, he questions the traditional view that the shift from hunting and gathering to agriculture led to “the surplus of food that allowed the leisure and specialisation that made civilisation.”

He also argues that it was only when hunter-gatherers, particularly fisher folk, started to live in settlements that agriculture could take form. He writes, “the archaeological evidence suggests that…sedentism—the radical human experiment with staying put, made agriculture possible, and not vice versa. Agriculture did not arise from need as it did from relative abundance. People stayed put, (and) had the leisure to experiment with plants.”

He is also an early exponent of the argument that agriculture has turned mankind into slaves. He writes, “We tamed the plants and animals so they could serve us, a sort of biological slavery, but if coevolution is true, the converse is also true. In biological terms, wheat is successful; its success is built on the fact that it tamed humans. Wheat altered us, altered our genome, to use us…. To a hog in a pen it must appear that he has enslaved the farmer. Why else would the guy show up twice a day with a buck full of feed? The hog believes this until the day he dies.”

Finally, he argues that somewhere along the line we have stopped eating food and begun eating commodities.

“Consider the range of plants humans consume, the hundreds of species. That’s food. Consider that two thirds of our calories come from wheat, rice and maize. Add sugar and you have a nearly complete picture of commodities. It is an oversimplification, but a useful one, to assert that these commodities have a fundamental and key distinction from the rest of food; they are storable and interchangeable and close to currency in their liquidity; in fact they are traded in markets just as currency is. They form the basis of wealth, and have done so for ten thousand years.”

Rice, he argues, is different, because “well over half of rice consumed is eaten by the same people who grew it.” He continues, “True, rice is storable, tradable, a dense package of carbohydrates that meets the definition of a commodity, but because it is the most important foodstuff of the world’s poorest people, it has many of the hallmarks of food.”

Yuval Noah Harari took up many of the same themes in Sapiens – A Brief History of Humankind. He writes,

“We did not domesticate wheat. It domesticated us. The word domesticate comes from the Latin ‘domus’, which means ‘house.’ Who’s the one living in a house? Not the wheat. It’s the sapiens….What then did wheat offer agriculturists..? It offered nothing for people as individuals. Yet it did bestow something on Homo Sapiens as a species. Cultivating wheat provided much more food per unit of territory, and therefore enabled Homo Sapiens to multiply exponentially….This is the essence of the Agricultural Revolution: the ability to keep more people alive under worse conditions.”

But is that really true? It would be true if we all lived in farming villages, wracked by disease and the occasional famine. But we don’t. Most of us live in comfortable cities. In the U.S. only one percent of the population is still engaged in farming. In Europe the figure is 4 percent; the global average is 28 percent.

Agriculture has enabled 99 percent of the U.S. population—and 72 percent of the world population—to escape the drudgery and hard labour of farming. Meanwhile, technology has lightened, at least a little, the workload on the farm. Agriculture has enabled all of us to live better lives.

At the same time agriculture has, along with improvements in health care, been one of the main enablers of our growing population. This is now putting a strain on the earth’s ecosystem. Agriculture has also contributed to environmental degradation through deforestation, reduced biodiversity, and climate change (through GHG emissions). To some extent, therefore, agriculture has become a victim of its own success.

The solution, however, is not to go back to some mythical golden era. The solution is in developing new technologies to improve the way in which our hard working farmers grow food, in order to reduce agriculture’s negative impacts on the environment.

This is already work in progress, and unlike Richard Manning, I am sure that it will succeed.

© Commodity Conversations ®

Commodity Conversations Weekly Press Summary

Another major commodity group, this time Louis Dreyfus, reported lower results because of global trade tensions and the African Swine Fever in China, along with the bad spring weather in the US Midwest. The CEO said the situation will remain difficult for the second half of the year and will only improve in 2020. Nonetheless, the firm paid USD 428 million in dividends for the first half of the year, the highest since 2014, as the chairwoman is reportedly looking to repay loans she took to buyout minority shareholders. 

China could have lost up to half of its pig herd to swine fever and the Vice Premier has set a target to return to a normal herd size as early as next year. In the meantime, the country is facing a shortage of 10 million mt of pork, more than the global trade supply. To deal with the shortage, a local pig farmer imported 906 breeding pigs from Denmark, the first pig imports this year. And a breeder in Nanning is looking to raise pigs that weigh up to 500kg, compared to the usual weight of around 125kg. 

US producers are also looking to take advantage of the surge in Chinese pork demand. To that end, JBS USA announced that it will remove ractopamine from its pig supply. Ractopamine is a growth drug banned in China and the EU. A US competitor, Smithfield Foods, has already dropped the additive to export to China while Tyson Foods said it was considering a similar move. 

Global trade is due to see another wave of protectionism as the WTO ruled that the US could impose duties worth USD 7.5 billion on EU products in response to the EU support of Airbus. The US will levy a 25% duty on EU food goods starting on October 18, but an EU official said the US seemed uninterested in finding a way to avoid the tariffs. Food firms in the US warned that this could have significant repercussions on their businesses. A cheese importer said he was stocking up with USD 15 million worth of Italians cheeses ahead of the duties. 

A Dutch-based company, DSM, published some potentially good news for both the environment and meat lovers. It developed a new feed that can reduce the amount of methane emitted by cows by up to 30%. The feed, called Bovaer, could be available in late 2020. Cows are responsible for a third of the methane emitted in the US but experts highlight two common misconceptions: the methane comes from burps, not farts, and the natural gas infrastructure still emits more methane. 

A new evaluation of published research also tried to correct a misconception by arguing that there was not enough evidence to support the claim that eating red meat can have a negative health impact. Researchers analysed past observational studies and concluded that the impact of eating red meat was very small and not supported by strong evidence. Health experts were quick to criticise the paper and some argued that nutritional research can not be held to the same standards as medical research. A professor highlighted that years of studies consistently found a negative health impact. And the press revealed that the lead researcher had failed to properly disclose his past ties to an industry group

Ireland revealed that the average sugar content in drinks dropped to 23g in 2019, compared to 31g before a sugar tax was introduced in 2015. Nonetheless, the government noted that some of the decrease was offset by larger container size and the growth in energy drink sales. Similarly, the UK said the sugar content in soft drinks dropped 28.8% since the introduction of a sugar tax in 2017, although the total consumption of sugar gained 2.6% between 2015 and 2018. Public Health England explained that the overall increase in sales of sweet products was enough to offset the drop in sugar content. 

Nonetheless, PepsiCo’s said a good performance from its low-sugar and bubbly sparkling water brands will help with revenue growth in 2019. And Coca-Cola announced that it will launch its energy drink in the US, as it noted that sales in the sector have been increasing while regular soft drink consumption has been steadily declining. Separately, Coca-Cola unveiled a new bottle that uses recycled marine plastics. The plastic was collected in the Mediterranean sea and is used for 25% of the bottle packaging. 

Two very unusual products were unveiled this week. Glenlivet launched whisky cocktails contained in a seaweed-based skin that dissolves in the mouth. And Aleph Farms announced that it has successfully grown lab-meat using cow sells, on the International Space Station

The Glenlivet