Commodity Conversations Weekly Press Summary

Glencore Agriculture saw its attributable share of profits for 2018 drop by 79% on year to USD 21 million in 2018. This was due to smaller grains and sugarcane crops in Australia, Argentina and Brazil, lower margins as well as issues related to the US/China trade war. The group’s Canadian handling operations did well, on the other hand, thanks to what Glencore called its “best-in-class efficiency and service.”

Glencore Agri, as well as COFCO, announced they were now part of the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) and its Soft Commodities Forum (SCF). COFCO’s chairman argued that the world’s food system needed to be transformed to improve diets and help farmers and the environment. As part of WBCSD’s goal of finding ways to feed the world sustainably, members of the Soft Commodities Forum – including Louis Dreyfus, ADM, Bunge and Cargill – said this week they would step up their commitment to increase transparency and traceability in Brazil’s soy supply chain.

Cargill has applied to patent a ‘high protein egg chip’ in a bid to offer a low-fat snacking alternative. The company said that snacking was becoming increasingly common, often replacing meals and that people wanted healthier options. In the Netherlands, the company is investing USD 23 million in its instant starch production facility to meet growing demand from the ready meals, sauces and soups’ segments.

Nestle announced a plan to start selling some 24 Starbucks products as part of what the CEO called “meaningful innovation.” A Forbes analyst pointed out that this was part of a wider strategy to adapt faster to change as activists and hedge funds are becoming increasingly vocal. FAIRR, for instance, which is a network representing investors worth a combined USD 11 trillion, sent letters to the world’s main fast food companies last month asking them to address climate risk in their supply chain.“Companies often respond quickly when large shareholders are asking them questions. Private sector and institutional investors are a huge lever of change,” a FAIRR official said.

Campbell Soup, too, has been under pressure from stakeholders to become more resilient and sustainable. The group teamed up with Land O’Lakes last year and launched a digital platform that collects data from farmers to help them become more efficient. Campbell expects that sustainability will help reduce costs in the long run. However, a group of experts warned that most of the world’s agricultural data was in the hands of a few multinationals, which increased the risks of conflict of interests as well as marginalised smaller players. They said policies were needed to ensure that the merger of big agricultural companies, especially seed companies, did not also lead to the “over-consolidation of farm data.”

The EU is spending the equivalent of 20% of its total budget encouraging livestock farming, according to research by Greenpeace. Europeans already consume twice as much meat and dairy as they should, the NGO pointed out, arguing that the funds would be better used to encourage grass-fed livestock as well as fruit and vegetable production. However, a source from the Commission disagreed with the numbers, adding that the funds were also used to save family farm models and not necessarily encourage industrialised farming. Also, the farmers’ association Copa Cogeca said that lower domestic meat production would not lead to a drop in meat consumption but rather to a rise in imports.

A recent FAO study suggests that livestock is, in fact, a very good way of converting forages which are not fit for human consumption into an important source of protein and nutrients. The study found that almost 90% of what is fed to livestock is inedible for humans and that a big part of the grazing areas is unusable to grow crops. Looking at dairy, total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have increased by 18% between 2005-2015, but emissions per kilo of milk have actually fallen by 11% in the same period thanks to improved efficiency. Researchers in Canada, meanwhile, are trying to correlate the amount of methane emitted in cow burps with the cow’s DNA in a bid to breed cows that produce less methane.

Taking it a step further, the tech company behind SellMyLivestock (SML) just launched “Tudder,” an app designed to help farmers find the right cow by using a model similar to the dating app Tinder. The group’s CEO explained that it used data to help predict whether this would be a good match, including the kind of offsprings the cow is likely to have.

The Sustainable Trade Initiative (IDH) thinks the EU is unlikely to meet its target of using only sustainable palm oil by 2020. IDH explained that palm oil has become such a sensitive topic that food companies are even wary of using the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) logo to avoid attracting attention to the fact they use palm oil at all.

Finally, after eating expired food for a year without falling sick, the head of MOM’s Organic Market called for an overhaul of the “vague and inconsistent” regulations used to determine ”best by” dates. This corroborates a survey in the US which showed that consumers are confused about food date labelling which causes a lot of unnecessary waste. The man compiled his ‘Year of eating expired food’ on his blog.

This summary was produced by ECRUU

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

AgriCensus Report

ANALYSIS: Iran’s corn need key as Brazil’s export, import flow up-ended

Brazil’s position as one of the few exporters prepared to run the gamut of US sanctions and supply corn to Iran is helping to upend the country’s export dynamics, as geopolitics, trade fears and economics sees southern states exchange Brazilian corn for Argentine imports.

“The crazy thing is that ports in the states of Rio Grande do Sul and Santa Catarina are exporting corn this month – this is not normal at all,” one market source told Agricensus.

The news comes as the same states – which are home to a significant chunk of Brazil’s livestock sector – have imported corn from Argentina in recent days, in a move that often reflects Brazil’s high domestic prices and poor internal supply logistics.

“The state of Santa Catarina normally buys some corn from Argentina and Paraguay because those countries are close, because Santa Catarina needs more corn than it is able to grow and because it’s cheaper to buy corn from those countries,” Agrural’s Daniele Siqueira told Agricensus.

Santa Catarina is too far south to have a second safrinha crop, where much of Brazil’s corn supply comes from, but is too far away from the big producing states of Mato Grosso and Parana to make supply logistics cost effective.

While it is not unusual for Argentina to supply corn to Brazil, the fact that the states are also exporting corn draws together disparate threads of trade war, Iran sanctions, Argentina’s record-breaking crop and Brazil’s domestic situation.

Southern star

Line-up data for Brazil’s principle ports in Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul – Rio Grande and Imbituba – shows nearly 650,000 mt of corn either loaded, loading or recently sailed.

“Farmers harvest soybeans later in those states and ports don’t have much to do right now… (but) they were not supposed to export corn, because their domestic market needs corn,” Siqueira said.

While the bulk is bound for Vietnam from Rio Grande, the port is also host to one cargo heading to the Middle East country, while Imbituba’s line-up is dominated by corn cargoes to Iran – with 197,122 mt set to sail.

Geopolitics

Which is where geopolitics kicks in – Iran has been increasingly reliant upon Brazilian corn supply since US president Donald Trump re-imposed sanctions on the country in December 2018.

That has seen some of the country’s auxiliary suppliers – countries such as Ukraine – show a degree of wariness about selling to Iran, fearing a backlash from the US.

That has consolidated Brazil’s position as the country’s number one corn supplier, and left Iran having to pay a substantial premium to secure supply.

“They are exporting to expensive destinations… the domestic market is equivalent to 120 cents over the March futures contract,” a second Brazil-based market source said.

That equates to around $194/mt, at a time when Argentina’s FOB Up River price stands at around $167.75/mt, according to Agricensus data – weighed down by expectations of a 46 million mt corn crop that is poised to come to market from March onwards.

While the financial reward is clear, the use of southern ports versus the typical main export hubs of Santos or Paranagua comes down in part to the timing of the soybean harvest and the ongoing strained trade relations between the US and China.

With Brazil’s soybeans are harvested as part of the country’s first crop, logistics typically switch towards soybeans at this time of the year – but China’s ongoing trade impasse with the US has added an extra incentive, and Brazil is gearing up for a big bean export performance.

Again, line-up data shows 89 ships are either waiting to load, loading or have recently sailed from Brazil’s main export hub of Santos.

Of these, only two are carrying corn, with 71 of the ships – some 80% – taking soybeans.

That leaves the southern states at a unique crossroads – meeting Iran’s supply needs through Brazil’s corn exports, while capitalising on competitive Argentine corn to meet its own needs. 

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is CAmRH3I55pt2UA9QGg6UVM5QkLe6Q7KWOsJvtn9Fo0SGUiuxOusVI3ZfbTXF1VfVuThRomI1eVgaN053wghykNTT36pA_Soe8AkEg8T5u0USwzkJGVrmnYG2z7V_j_fRl2E2Wzbc
AgriCensus Prices
Over 500 daily Spot Marker and Forward Curve price assessments for wheat, corn, soy, barley, vegoils, meals and seeds.
Subscribe now

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

We didn’t see that coming


At the end of every year since 2006, Rabobank asks their contacts in the food supply chain (“ranging from start-up founders to CEOs of zillion-dollar companies, and everyone in between”) the following question: “In the world of food, what surprised you the most over the last twelve months?” This year they received over 200 responses, some surprising, some less so.

Overall, respondents were “surprised” by the way the food supply chain is managing to respond quickly to constant changes in consumers’ demands. As one client wrote: “From delivering new products, changing business models, adjusting to consumer shifts, investing in innovation in various forms, and facing tough realities, the world of food is markedly different.” Heads are no longer being buried in the sand, as “it seems that everyone suddenly woke up.”

However there was still some criticism of “”Big Food,” with one respondent writing that he was surprised that “that big-food-brands companies are still struggling to grow despite most of them revising strategies and replacing CEOs.” Another was surprised that “the troubles faced by the Big CPGs, with brands my mom and grandparents used to buy, seemed to get worse over the past year despite so much renovation and reconfiguration of operations and marketing approaches.”

Some respondents talked about the way Big Food is trying to achieve top-line growth “via overpriced acquisitions that are shareholder wealth destructive”. Another remarked “companies continue to chase the unicorns by overpaying because they have few ideas of their own and get desperate.”

Many respondents expressed surprise at the rapidity with which consumers are embracing plant-based foods and/or a “flexitarian” diet. One client replied that he was surprised by “the acceleration of plant-based foods – and the growing acceptance of the products by non-vegan, non-vegetarian consumers regardless if their motivation is for health, animal welfare, or environment.”

Respondents were almost unanimous in their view that this is an enduring trend rather than a “fad”, but many stressed that the diet was not for everyone. One wrote, “Despite all the money flowing into replacement meat products, I don’t see the evidence of consumer desires for these products.” Another mentioned the “mismatch between what the media is writing about and reality.”

One “surprise” that was cited was the different ways in which consumers respond to technology in their food supply. Some clients detected a thawing in relations between food and science: although “consumers have been rejecting science more and more over the past decade” (such as the non-GMO movement), there is growing appreciation of the role of technology in many aspects of food and agricultural production”.

However, one respondent wrote he was frustrated by “the rising tendency for people to selectively believe science only when it aligns with their beliefs.” Others were surprised by the lack of pushback by food companies against the anti-science bias in food. One criticised “the willingness of some food companies to ignore science and chase consumer fads.” Examples included the proliferation of free-from claims on “products that never have, nor will have, certain ingredients.”

Some respondents expressed surprise “by how quickly capital and ideas are flowing to the nascent and undefined world of CBD, (cannabidiol – a non-intoxicating cannabinoid found in cannabis and hemp) both in food and beverages.” One expressed surprise that food companies and retailers are “embracing CBD given regulatory uncertainty, not to mention uncertainty around its effectiveness, proper dosage, etc.”

However, with the passing of the latest Farm Bill taking industrial hemp off the list of Schedule 1 narcotics (as defined by the Controlled Substance Act), one respondent wrote, “I almost see this as a space that can be as deep and wide as alcoholic beverages, and large strategics are having to act quickly to determine whether or not they want to take the risk of playing in this space (or not).”

Among other surprises cited in the survey was “the velocity and breadth at which #MeToo rippled through the restaurant industry, resulting in rapid response and swift changes.” Regarding the environment, one client wrote, “This year we did not see coming the food industry disruption associated with use of plastic straws.” And for trade, one mentioned “The rapidity with which the trade war with China escalated, the resultant tariffs, and their impacts on fruit and nut producers in the U.S.”

Finally, the last word is left to the respondent who wrote that he was “surprised by the ferocity of the arguments about whether low-fat or low-carbohydrate diets are better for weight status. Really, both work, provided people adhere to them, and calories really do matter.”

Commodity Conversations Weekly Press Summary

The sugar industry got together this week to launch the Dubai Blockchain Declaration. The initiative, led by the head of the Dubai-based refinery Al Khaleej Sugar and a number of industry stakeholders, is designed to streamline efforts to develop technological solutions that will make trading and shipping more transparent and more efficient. This follows last October’s announcement that the world’s four major trading houses (ADM, Bunge, Louis Dreyfus and Cargill followed shortly by COFCO) were getting together to implement blockchain technology in agricultural trading.

Times are tough for sweetener producers. Louis Dreyfus’ Brazil-based Biosev reported a loss of USD 240 million in 2018/19 up to December, an 8% increase on year. Nonetheless, the CEO noted that Biosev was not looking at divesting assets further. The head of COFCO, on the other hand, said the firm was looking at purchasing more sugar assets in Brazil. In Europe, meanwhile, major producer Cristal Union says one fifth of the producing capacity was uncompetitive, which means some 10-20 factories are expected to close doors within the next 5 years.

Tate & Lyle reported that it was facing declining demand for sweeteners in North America, mostly because of lower sales to large soft drink manufacturers. Ingredion also reported a smaller income for its sweetener segment in North America. The stevia-maker mentioned that it was looking at acquisitions, while some suggested that Tate & Lyle could be a potential target for a takeover. Stevia has been going through some bad press, however, including allegations that the plant was causing deforestation and water pollution in Peru and China. This has pushed Tate & Lyle and producer Sweet Green Fields to tie up with NGO Earthwatch to assess the sustainability of their supply chain.

Coca Cola has maintained a strong growth in the US despite a falling demand for soft drinks. The success comes mostly from its pricing power and the launch of new beverages, along with a focus on higher margin operations. Technology is also helping Coca Cola cut down on a lengthy and costly process: market research. The group was able to assess whether it should introduce its premium water brand Valser in the US through the crowdfunding website Indiegogo. Only a month after the campaign started, some restaurants already started selling Valser. The move was part of the new CEO’s strategy to experiment and “make mistakes”.

Last year was a good one for Unilever who reported a 51% increase in net profit at USD 11.1 billion, although it noticed a rise in costs because of higher commodity prices. The firm reduced its advertising expenditure by 29% in the UK in 2018 as part of efforts to reduce marketing costs. It lost a rank in the list of biggest advertisers to number four, while McDonalds took the third place after increasing ad spending by 28% to USD 158 million. Otherwise, Unilever joined Yorkshire Tea, Twinings, Tetley and Clipper, and published its full tea suppliers’ list.

Transparency is also one of Olam’s priorities, according to a spokesperson, who noted that sustainably in the cocoa chain was particularly important to ensure the survival of the industry. The firm hopes to achieve a 100% sustainable and transparent supply by 2020. Olam, one of the largest players in the cocoa market, took the opportunity to encourage people to eat chocolate on Valentines Day as a way to help farmers.

During an audit of the dairy supply chain, the Brazilian government found that Danone and Dairy Partners Americas Brasil (DPA) – a joint venture between Nestle and New-Zealand’s Fonterra –  could be complicit in using slave labour. Auditors found that Danone and DPA failed to properly monitor one of the businessman they worked with, who was found to rely on indentured workers.

Alarmed by the sharp fall in insect population, another group of scientists joined a global call to drastically change the way we make our food. A new meta study published in the journal Biological Conservation found that 40% of the world’s insects were in decline and that insects could be completely gone within a century, leading to a collapse of most ecosystems. They point to intensive industrial agriculture and pesticides as the main culprits.
Protecting the environment was the main objective of a flurry of studies that came out with diet recommendations recently, such as the Lancet “Planetary Health Diet”. After trying it out himself, this journalist argued that the diet could never be realistically adopted in most of the developed world as it called for people to avoid all processed food, along with all food additives. His main criticism, however, was that the report forgot to include spices and that everything tasted bland!

This summary was produced by ECRUU

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

AgriCensus Report

EU to cash $70bn in from trade war, Brazil to benefit $10bn: UN

The European Union will profit the most from changes in global trade due to the US-China trade war, with Brazil cashing in $10.5 billion annually if the world’s two largest economies expand the trade war, a UN report published this week showed.

The study by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development shows that the EU will benefit from $70 billion worth of increased trade, equivalent to 0.9% of the bloc’s total exports.

Of that headline figure, $50 billion will replace Chinese exports to the US, with $20 billion capturing US exports to China.

President Trump has warned that if no deal is reached by March 1, the additional tax rates on Chinese goods will increase from 10% to 25% with China to react reciprocally.

The UN estimates that of the $250 billion of Chinese exports taxed by the US, 82% will be snatched up by firms in third countries, with 12% to be retained by Chinese firms and just 6% by US companies.

Conversely, of the $110 billion of US exports taxed by China, 85% will go to other countries, with US firms holding on to 10%, and Chinese companies only seeing a 5% increase.

“The reason is simple: bilateral tariffs alter global competitiveness to the advantage of firms operating in countries not directly affected by them,” UNCTAD concluded.

The EU is able to step into the void as it is best placed to offer the goods and services at a competitive rate while having the economic capacity to do so.

“Our analysis shows that while bilateral tariffs are not very effective in protecting domestic firms, they are valid instruments to limit trade from the targeted country,” UNCTAD’s head of international trade division, Pamela Coke-Hamilton, said.

Brazilian beans

Brazil, who became China’s number one soybean supplier in 2018 following the trade war, will benefit to the tune of $10.5 billion, equivalent to a 3.8% increase in annual exports and making it the eight largest beneficiary from the trade war.

Yet, only 20% of that increase is due to Chinese tariffs on US goods, meaning that the largest benefits for Brazil are to be reaped from additional trade with the US, such as metals and machinery, rather than additional soybean sales to China.

While higher cash prices for soybeans were welcomed by Brazilian farmers, industry concerns remain over what will happen when the trade war ends and tariffs imposed on US beans are lifted.

“Because the magnitude and duration of tariffs is unclear, Brazilian producers have been reluctant to make investment decisions that may turn out to be unprofitable if the tariffs are revoked,” the study said.

In 2018, Brazil exported 69 million mt of soybeans to China worth $27.5 billion, up from $20.3 billion the year before, Brazilian customs data showed.

Mexico, Japan and Canada were other large beneficiaries, following the EU, and each captured more than $20 billion.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is CAmRH3I55pt2UA9QGg6UVM5QkLe6Q7KWOsJvtn9Fo0SGUiuxOusVI3ZfbTXF1VfVuThRomI1eVgaN053wghykNTT36pA_Soe8AkEg8T5u0USwzkJGVrmnYG2z7V_j_fRl2E2Wzbc
AgriCensus Prices
Over 500 daily Spot Marker and Forward Curve price assessments for wheat, corn, soy, barley, vegoils, meals and seeds.
Subscribe now

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Sleep and obesity

When I was researching my book « The Sugar Casino », one of the questions that puzzled me was why we are consuming more calories than in the past. Referring to USDA data, I wrote,

« According to the loss-adjusted food availability data, Americans are consuming more calories per day than they did 40 years ago. In 1970, Americans consumed an estimated 2,109 calories per person per day; in 2010 they consumed an estimated 2,568 calories….

The average American is eating 459 calories more each day today than he, or his parents, were eating in 1970. »

I have now, rather surprisingly, found part of the answer to that question in « Why We Sleep: The New Science of Sleep and Dreams » by Matthew Walker, a British scientist and professor of neuroscience and psychology at the University of California, Berkeley. He was previously a professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School. (An article in last week’s Guardian newspaper summarised some of the main themes of the book.)

Regarding the effect that sleep has on health, particularly on obesity, Mr Walker explains that two hormones in your brain control your appetite: leptin and ghrelin. Leptin signals a sense of feeling full, while ghrelin triggers a strong sense of hunger.  He writes that clinical tests have shown that « inadequate sleep decreased concentrations of the satiety-signalling hormone leptin and increased levels of hunger-instigating hormone ghrelin. »

Looking to see what this might mean in practice, one clinical test found that individuals who slept between four and six hours per night consumed 300 calories per day more than individuals who slept eight and a half hours per night. He writes, « Scale that up to a working year, and assuming one month of vacation in which sleep becomes abundant, and you will have consumed more than 70,000 extra calories. Based on calorific estimates, that would cause 10 to 15 pounds of weight gain a year. »

But it is not just a question of how much you eat, but also what you eat. Sleep loss increases the levels of endocannabinoids which, like marijuana, can give you the « munchies ».

In one test, participants were given access to an unlimited lunchtime buffet. « Despite eating almost 2,000 calories during the buffet lunch, sleep-deprived individuals dove into the snack bar. They consumed an additional 330 calories of snack foods after the full meal, compared to when they were getting plenty of sleep each night. »

Tests also found that sleep deprived individuals were 30 to 40 percent more likely to have cravings for sweets, carbohydrate-rich foods, and salty snacks compared to protein-rich foods such as meat or fish.

And Mr Walker counters the argument that your body needs more calories the less it sleeps. He writes, « Sleep, it turns out, is an intensely metabolic active state for body and brain alike. » What’s more, the less you sleep, he argues, the less active you will be during the day. He writes, « inadequate sleep is the perfect recipe for obesity: greater calorie intake, lower calorie consumption. » He continues,

« Of course, the obesity epidemic that has engulfed large portions of the world is not caused by lack of sleep alone. The rise in consumption of processed foods, an increase in serving sizes, and the more sedentary nature of human beings are all triggers. However, these changes are insufficient to explain the dramatic escalation of obesity. »

To emphasise the point, Mr Walker plots the reduction in sleep time (dotted line) over the past 50 years in the US on the same graph as the rise in obesity rates (below).

He summarises the current state of scientific research as follows: « Short sleep (of the type than many adults in first-world countries commonly and routinely report) will increase hunger and appetite, compromise impulse control within the brain, increase food consumption (especially of high-calorie foods), decrease feelings of food satisfaction after eating, and prevent effective weight loss when dieting. »

And as a warning for future generations, he argues, “We are now observing these effects very early in life. Three-year-olds sleeping just ten and a half hours or less per night have a 45 percent increased risk of being obese by age seven than those who get twelve hours sleep a night. To set our children on a pathway of ill health this early in life by way of sleep neglect is a travesty”

Going back to my original question, it is possible that changing sleeping habits explain 300 of the more than 450 extra calories that we consume each day compared to our parents. The rest, I imagine, can be explained by the greater availability of calorie-rich processed foods and larger portion sizes.

So if after a long night entertaining customers you are now reading this blog on your telephone while trying to stay awake at the back of a conference hall, let yourself drift off. It may mean you eat less at the conference lunch buffet!

Commodity Conversations Weekly Press Summary

ADM reported a USD 315 million profit in the fourth quarter, down from USD 788 million in the same period last year. The drop was due to lower revenue in its origination business and ethanol segment as well as increased costs in the North America liquid-sweeteners segment. The company noted, however, that it managed to stay profitable despite the US-China trade war and subsequent collapse in US origination to China. The CEO forecast that the trade war will be resolved within the first half of 2019, as he noted that China has already started buying US soybean again, which should help the company recover in the second half of the year.

Otherwise, ADM has officially acquired French animal feed group Neovia for USD 1.8 billion, its biggest acquisition in 5 years. The company announced last week that the move was part of the strategy to gain market share in the nutrition segment. ADM’s investment arm, ADM Venture, has also invested in Sustainable Bioproducts, a technology company looking at ways to produce a protein with a minimal impact on the environment. At the same time, ADM has committed to gender parity in its senior leadership structure by 2030.

Nestle has bought the rights to Ferri Pro, a technology that will allow them to fortify food products with iron without affecting the taste and help the estimated 1.6 billion people who have iron deficiencies. Nestle also tied up with Swiss universities to create The Future Food Initiative which aims to accelerate research in creating nutritious, tasty and sustainable food. As part of the efforts to improve transparency in the supply chain, it will make public the list of suppliers of 15 priority commodities – the equivalent of 95% of all its raw materials.

In a similar bid, a US group launched Indigo Transport, a network of independent carriers for transporting grain throughout the US, which will hopefully make crop transport more transparent and efficient. The technology, which is already being dubbed the ‘Uber for US crops’ has already 3,000 registered trucks. It will complement its e-commerce platform which has seen grains transactions worth USD 10 billion since it launched in the middle of 2018.

However, high costs and insufficient network coverage means that farmers are still slow to pick on these smart tools. Figures from 2016 suggest that close to 40% of US rural areas don’t have high-speed broadband. The Farm Bill that was passed in December includes the Precision Agriculture Connectivity Act as well as some funds to boost connectivity in the countryside. But Telecom companies say that low population density and tough natural conditions make it very expensive to do so.

Brazil, meanwhile, should see investments close to USD 35 million in 2018/19 towards the development of internet connectivity and smart agriculture. The country’s biggest sugar producer is carrying out a test project using 4G to transmit data on agriculture operations which could reduce costs. The Brazilian Association of the Internet of Things (Abinc) estimates that better connectivity could help improve productivity by as much as 20% by improving soil, weather predictions, field management and transport logistics, among other things. Similarly, IBM expects that better technology, notably on weather forecasting, could help reduce yield losses by 25%.

Meanwhile, a new Australian project is trying to make people more aware of the importance of bees and the role they play in our food production by building a camera designed to show us how bees see the world. You’ll learn that bees need to get very close to an object to see it clearly. You can check it out here.

Finally, a new study argues that food companies have been using the wrong language to encourage consumers to switch to eating more plant-based products. The World Resources Institute found that terms such as ‘low fat’ or ‘meat-free’ tend to make food less appealing and that switching to a more enticing marketing vocabulary could increase sales by 70% and help reduce meat consumption.

This summary was produced by ECRUU

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

AgriCensus Report

ADM Q4 profits slump despite surging crush margins

Agribusiness major Archer Daniels Midland posted a 60% slump in profits in the fourth quarter of last year, falling from earnings per share of 139 cents in Q4 2017 to just 55 cents in Q4 2018.

ADM reported earnings per share of 88 cents on revenue of $15.95 billion for the fourth quarter last year, falling short of analyst estimates of 92 cents and $16.8 billion.

The results came despite soaring profits in its oilseeds and origination business, which more than doubled to $432 million from $201 million in the fourth quarter last year as the company cashed in on low soybean prices in the US and high global soymeal prices.

Lower revenues from the company’s origination business, which includes grain trading and handling, hit profits after China slapped a tax on US soybeans, seeing a collapse in trading volumes in the US.

“Looking forward, the crush environment in 2019 will not be as spectacular as 2018. Given global demand and the strength we have outside China this business will maintain crush margins well above average over the last five years,” Juan Luciano, ADM CEO, told investors Tuesday.

Operating profit in the company’s carbohydrate solutions business, which includes its biofuels production, fell 31% due to poor ethanol margins amid record US supply.

ADM has been investing downstream in the feed chain in an attempt to gain a foothold in higher margin businesses.

In terms of soybean crush margins, ADM said it had locked in gross margins of $30-35/mt at its crushing facilities in the US with high utilisation rates. Meanwhile, in canola, margins were in the region of $42-45/mt.

In terms of rapeseed crush in Europe, the company said meal replacement from China as well as good demand in Europe had kept meal prices high, leaving margins at around $35/mt.

Finally, in Brazil it said its crush facilities at ports had locked in margins of $10-15/mt and $25-30/mt gross margins at “facilities that are geared towards the domestic market”.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is CAmRH3I55pt2UA9QGg6UVM5QkLe6Q7KWOsJvtn9Fo0SGUiuxOusVI3ZfbTXF1VfVuThRomI1eVgaN053wghykNTT36pA_Soe8AkEg8T5u0USwzkJGVrmnYG2z7V_j_fRl2E2Wzbc
AgriCensus Prices
Over 500 daily Spot Marker and Forward Curve price assessments for wheat, corn, soy, barley, vegoils, meals and seeds.
Subscribe now

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

It is about people

A conversation with José Orive, Executive Director of the International Sugar Organisation

Good morning José. Could you please tell me a little about yourself?

I grew up on a ranch in Guatemala; we were mainly cattle, but we did have some sugarcane and we fed the molasses to the cattle. My brother stayed on the farm and I studied law at Georgetown University in the US, and then did a masters degree in international trade agreements. That led to me working with the Guatemalan diplomatic service as a trade negotiator.

So you are a diplomat with experience of trade negotiations. Does that help in your current role?

It does, especially given the sensitivity around sugar at the moment. Different people have different expectations—and the cultural differences are enormous. Although most people view the ISO as “being about statistics,” we are really about people.

But what does the ISO do exactly?

We are a United Nations body that came out of the Bretton Woods Agreement. It was part of the post-World War era, where food security was of paramount importance.

At first, the ISO intervened actively in the world sugar market, telling people what to produce, when to market it, what stocks to hold and what price to sell at. But by the end of the 1970s, countries realized that the market did all those things better, and did away with the so-called “economic clauses” of the agreement.

Our role now is to monitor, analyse and study the world of sugar and biofuels. Our goal is to produce intelligence that enriches people’s decision making. We avoid telling people what to do, but we lay out the variables and the key factors around issues that are pertinent to the sugar world.

We have 88 country members, including the EU, which acts as one party, and 10 staff.

Is it part of your mandate to defend the sugar industry?

Yes it is. We have an advocate role. It is an interesting function, as many governments do not have a single voice on the issue. Sometimes we act as arbitrators between ministers of health and ministers of trade and agriculture—around the importance of sugar for sustainable development and its role in nutrition as part of a healthy diet.

You have to remember that the sugar industry is a key driver for development and incomes in rural areas in many developing countries. When you visit these countries you can see how villages and small towns can be lifted up when a sugar mill opens nearby. You will see schools and hospitals being built, and then the next generation ends up with a college degree. That is something that governments have to encourage. Sugar plays a huge part in that; it is a driver for development.

Does the ISO also get involved in arbitrating between farmers and millers?

We are currently undertaking a study of the payment systems of cane and beet worldwide. One of the main drivers for this has been the desire of growers of beet and cane to participate in downstream projects such as ethanol, electricity co-generation and green plastics.

Some millers want farmers to participate in the downstream products, but they argue that farmers have to invest with them and assume some of the risk. Other millers say, “No, we acquire the raw material and we pay for it. What we do with it is our business and not yours, because you have been paid. We can lose money in a bad year if the price of these products is
low, but that is our risk and not yours.”

With governments becoming increasingly anti-sugar, are they asking themselves why they should be members of an organization whose role it is to promote the sugar industry?

I haven’t seen a country or a government directly question their membership as a result of their position on sugar. That said, it is almost impossible to stop finance ministers from considering a sugar tax. They look at the additional revenue and it is hard for them to resist. Sugar taxes are driven both by politics and revenue. The tax in Mexico raised $1.2 billion over two years.

Do sugar taxes reduce sugar consumption?

If you take Mexico as an example, domestic sugar consumption dropped during the first year after the tax was introduced in 2014-15, but by the beginning of 2017 it was back to its pre-tax level. By September 2017, consumption was above the pre-tax level.

Politicians suppose that if they make a product more expensive people will stop consuming it, or consume less of it. But that is not the case when the product is relatively cheap to start with.

But aren’t sugar taxes just taxes on the poor? Rich people don’t care, but people on low incomes do. And as you have shown in Mexico, they don’t consume less; they just pay more in taxes.  

That is exactly the case in Mexico where sugar consumption is overwhelming concentrated among the poorer sectors of society.

But is that money being given back to the poor in terms of education or healthcare?

That is the question. I don’t understand why governments aren’t making a big fuss about all the schools and hospitals that they are building with the revenue from the sugar tax. But they aren’t. It is total silence.

If you have $600 million coming in per year and you are only spending $200 million on schools and hospitals, people will start asking what you are doing with the rest of the money. And people will start asking whether the money has been spent efficiently. Politicians hate that.  We have tried to look at the figures in some countries, and we must try to get the politicians to stand up and be transparent with the numbers.

Some advocates of sugar taxes have asked for the revenues raised to go into a separate fund, but in most cases this hasn’t happened. The money just gets funnelled into the general kitty box.

Are you arguing that the sugar taxes have not had any effect on sugar consumption?

Sugar taxes don’t seem to have affected consumption in developing countries, but per-capita consumption in niche markets of developed countries is falling, and the anti-sugar lobbyists are claiming credit for that.

But per-capita sugar consumption in developed countries has been falling for the past fifty years.

Historically, global sugar consumption has been rising at 2.0/2.1 percent per year. Now it is rising 1.6/1.5 percent. The growth in global sugar consumption has slowed, but the total amount consumed is still growing. England is an exception to that; total sugar consumption is dropping in the UK.

Apart from sugar taxes, what are the other challenges facing the industry?

Producers are realising that they have to diversify, and not to put all their eggs in one basket. The companies that are diversified are doing well in spite of the current low sugar prices. I think the traditional model of specializing in, and just producing, sugar is outdated.

I also believe that more effort needs to be made to bring together cane growers and millers, beet growers and factory owners. The industry also needs to work together better to share best practises in terms of sustainability, nutrition and new technologies.

And what are your main challenges at the ISO?

First, we have to stay relevant, to constantly tweak our products and services to make sure that they are relevant to our members. I am sure that we can do more with the data that we have, and we are working on that.

Second, we have not only to maintain our existing membership but we also have to bring in new members.

Third, we have to organize good events—events that are rich in content, interactive and dynamic.

Fourth, we must build relations with our sister organisations in other commodities, to learn from them and share with them.

Fifth, we must learn how to better engage with NGOs, for example on child labour and sustainability, and with health organisations, on sugar and nutrition. If governments are going to adopt policies that affect our industry, then our industry needs to have a seat at
the table.

Where are the success stories in the sugar industry?

There are many. The role that sugar plays in rural development is well documented, but it also has a role in nutrition. Guatemala has the world’s most successful micronutrient programme with the fortification of sugar with Vitamin A. The programme has completely eradicated infant blindness in the country, as well as leading to a fall in child mortality. Malawi and Tanzania are now following Guatemala’s example. We need to do more
to highlight these successes.

Thank you José for your time.

Commodity Conversations Weekly Press Summary

In an effort to differentiate itself and avoid competing with other agricultural giants, Olam announced that it will sell its rubber, sugar, wood products and fertiliser businesses over the next 6 years. The money raised will go towards a USD 3.5 billion investment to grow the dairy, nuts, grains and animal feed segments, which are Olam’s strongest sectors. The company head added that Olam will also seek to focus on sustainability and digitalisation to stay relevant amid shifting consumer preferences.

In contrast, Louis Dreyfus’ Biosev has denied reports that it is planning to sell its 10 sugar production units in Brazil. Otherwise, the chairperson of Louis Dreyfus Company announced that her family trust had completed the purchase of minority shares and that the trust now owned 96.2% of the company.

The sugar industry has been consolidating amid a sharp fall in prices, and three groups – Alvean, RaW (a Raizen-Wilmar venture) and Sucden – now control 60% of the word sugar trading, while Alvean alone has a market share of 30% of global raw sugar trading, according to an analysis.

Meanwhile, in the grain sector, the trading world is noticing the growing role of China’s Cofco. In 2017, Cofco exported 11 million mt of grains and by-products from Argentina, only slightly less than Cargill’s 11.5 million mt. The situation was the same in Brazil, where Cofco was tied with Louis Dreyfus as the third-biggest soybean exporter, behind Cargill and Bunge.

In China, commodity exchanges launched three new options contracts this week for corn, cotton and rubber, adding to the existing soybean meal, sugar and copper contracts. The move comes as the government is hoping to gain a bigger role in establishing commodity prices by attracting more commercial and producer hedging.

The EU unveiled a major policy change this week when the Commission concluded that US soybeans would be considered as a sustainable feedstock for its biofuel program, which will cap the use of crops associated with land-use changes in 2030. The decision was quickly welcomed by the US Soybean Export Council as soybean growers were under significant stress this year when exports to China stopped. The EU decision will also reassure the US who had threatened to impose tariffs on EU goods unless the bloc imported more agricultural products.

The decision comes as the EU is looking for alternative feedstocks to replace the palm oil that goes into making biodiesel. However, Indonesia and Malaysia – the two largest palm oil producers – are threatening to retaliate if a palm oil ban is implemented, arguing that it would violate WTO rules. The Prime Minister of Malaysia sent a letter to the French President and said he could launch a “Buy French Last” policy in response. The comment referenced the “Buy British Last” campaign of the 1980s which required all British imports to be approved by the PM’s office.

Meanwhile, the French President reversed his 2017 pledge and said it would be impossible to completely ban the use of glyphosate by 2021, as entire sectors would be destroyed because of a lack of viable alternatives. And in the UK, a group of lobbyists from the US is arguing in favour of extending the use of glyphosate after the country leaves the EU. The lobbyists are in the country to push for more lenient policies post-Brexit, in what an association said could be “a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity”. American producers are asking the UK to consider allowing the sale of hormone-fed beef, GM crops, antibiotics in meats and limit geographic labelling rules.

A lot of media attention went to the Lancet Commission on Obesity report published this week, as it called for a broad international treaty to curtail the role of the food industry in policy development. Profit-driven food and drink producers are causing an obesity epidemic, while also contributing to malnutrition and climate change, it argued. The report mentioned similar efforts by the tobacco industry to control public policy and suggested that the WHO’s global conventions on tobacco could serve as a model to exclude the food industry from policy making.

The good news, perhaps ironically, is that food crops could actually benefit from higher global temperatures, according to a new study. Scientists previously thought that crop nutrition would keep dropping as the levels of CO2 in the atmosphere increases, while yields will increase. The new study found that higher temperatures could have the opposite effect: boosting nutrition and lowering yields, counteracting the effect of CO2.

If you looking for more agricultural action this week, we suggest watching the new Farming Simulator video game tournament! That’s right, players are planning to compete playing the popular farming game over 10 events in Europe, with a cash price of EUR 250,000 for the winner.

This summary was produced by ECRUU

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.